The story of a woman who forgave her husband for infidelity but was sued for divorce shortly thereafter became a hot topic. On the 21st, according to YTN radio ‘Attorney In-seop Cho’s Counseling Center’, Mr. A, who sent her story, found shocking pictures and videos on the computer she shared with her husband . She kept pictures and videos on her computer that her husband had taken with the woman he was having an affair with.
Much shocked by her, Mr. A filed a divorce suit against her husband, and her husband begged her Mr. A to forgive her. Mr. A thought her husband’s apology was sincere. She also said she had to drop her lawsuit because she still had young children. When her charter period expired, her husband suggested, “Let’s make a fresh start in a new place,” and Mr. A followed his will.
But three months later, the unimaginable happened. Her husband, who had sought forgiveness after finding out about her affair, filed a divorce suit against Mr. A. The husband insisted that Mr. A was at fault, saying, “I decided to forgive everything, but treated him unfairly, such as getting angry.”
In addition, it is said that he transferred 200 million won, excluding bank loans, to his mother’s account in order to create a favorable situation for the division of his property. Mr. A explained, “The 200 million won was originally prepared as business profits,” and “they brazenly said that the 200 million won I gave to my mother was to repay the original borrowed money, and that the deposit for the newly moved house was all a bank loan, so there was no property to divide메이저놀이터” Mr. A said that he was worried not only about property division but also child support. He said, “It seems realistically difficult for me to raise my children, so I want my husband to raise them.” How should A respond? Attorney Yoon-yong Cho believed that it was possible for Mr. A to file a claim for divorce and alimony against her husband again. Attorney Cho said, “Article 841 of the Civil Act stipulates that a divorce cannot be requested if a spouse’s cheating is forgiven ex post facto.
“According to the Supreme Court precedent, in order for posthumous forgiveness to be recognized, voluntariness and a sincere intention to continue the marital relationship must be expressed.
Regarding the husband’s claim that ‘there is no net property to divide the property’, she said, “The fact of borrowing against the mother must be proved with objective evidence.”
Regarding the request to pay child support in a lump sum, he said, “There are cases where this adjustment has been made by agreement between the parties, but it is difficult to make a judgment of this nature based on a unilateral request.”