Lee Young-ha (26) of the Doosan Bears was acquitted of the charges of special assault, coercion and extortion at the Seoul Western District Court on the 31st of last month.
Previously, Lee Young-ha and LG Twins Kim Dae-hyeon (26) were investigated for allegedly engaging in school violence against their juniors while attending Sunrin Internet High School, and were indicted and put on trial. Kim Dae-hyun, who was a soldier at the time of the indictment, was acquitted in January of this year at the 1st Regional Military Court on the grounds that there was insufficient evidence to prove the charges. Lee Young-ha had the same reason. On the 5th, the prosecution filed an appeal claiming misrepresentation of facts and misunderstanding of law.
The case began when Kim Dae-hyun and Lee Young-ha’s juniors in the high school baseball club reported to the Sports Ethics Center that they had been bullied in the past, and the Sports Ethics Center, which received the report, requested an investigation after reviewing it. After going through the police and prosecutor’s office, he was indicted and reached a criminal trial. At the time of the indictment, both players strongly denied the allegations. In addition, it was evaluated that the prosecution was conscious of the statute of limitations for being prosecuted two weeks after the police sent it to the prosecution.
The lawyers of the two players said that after they were acquitted, the Sports Ethics Center requested an investigation agency in a state where the case was not well filtered, the police felt burdened and sent it to the prosecution without proper investigation, and the prosecution It was pointed out that they did not investigate the players.
Looking at the contents of the ruling published in the press and the interview with the lawyer, I thought, ‘What if there was a more detailed investigation and investigation on the basic contents, such as the time and place of the report and the absence of the person concerned’. The interview with the lawyer also seems to have expressed regret about the case rather than expressing dissatisfaction with the reporter, the Sports Ethics Center, and the investigative agency. If so, what can be done to improve this disappointment? 메이저놀이터
First of all, it is necessary to secure the expertise of the Sports Ethics Center. The National Sports Promotion Act stipulates the establishment of the Sports Ethics Center to secure fairness in sports and protect the human rights of athletes, and the Sports Ethics Center was launched in August 2020. The Sports Ethics Center receives and investigates reports of human rights violations and corruption in the sports world, and supports reporters and victims. It is also responsible for investigating human rights violations at sports sites and preventing and preventing human rights violations and corruption in the sports field. If it is judged that there is a suspicion through the investigation, it has considerable authority and position enough to accuse the investigative agency or demand disciplinary action from the Minister of Culture and Sports.
The question is whether the Sports Ethics Center can properly fulfill this role. According to the National Sports Promotion Act, counseling and reports on human rights violations and corruption in the sports world are concentrated in the Sports Ethics Center, so experts and facilities are needed to handle this. This is especially true as the Sports Ethics Center can be the only place to intervene in the early stages of a case if the victim does not immediately report it to the investigative agency. It is worth considering that academics and practitioners have insisted on the need for a special judicial police officer in the Sports Ethics Center.
A thorough investigation by investigative agencies is also necessary. In particular, if an investigation is requested for the contents of an investigation by another institution, such as the Sports Ethics Center, there is a risk that the direction of the investigation may be wrong or omitted. Secrecy and promptness are important in an investigation, and as those involved can already hide or deny the charges while undergoing an initial investigation, it is important to check accurate data and investigate the accusations.
Accurate and prompt investigation, investigation and judgment are important for both the reporter and the respondent. If there are actual human rights violations and corruption, correct them and restore the damage, and if there is no such thing, get rid of the charges quickly. This is because I think both are the roles of the Sports Ethics Center and investigative agencies.